A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours in excess of the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes captivated countrywide consideration following an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed relatives household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has developed into a really publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, request to build their household house. The case is becoming emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, exactly where growth pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of founded residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted less than scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both people of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their scheduling authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as such areas are subject matter to strict controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, significantly in the delicate coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right position. Their legal team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to maintain their perspective, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, where views of The ocean are equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In keeping with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments, a picture that has since become emblematic in the intensity in the dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they were being meant to Get visual evidence of the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water in the course of serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the location turned one of the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these types of actions were being cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as audience sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court read even further submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as constructed, goes past what was authorised and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling documents, maps, and ailments hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is inspired by problem for environmental safety and adherence to arranging regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their extensive-standing connection to the realm and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair only looking to establish a family home in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Particular Region of Conservation and say that each one works are actually carried out according to Experienced suggestions and authorized programs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with getting into the sea René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site all through a storm, don't alter the underlying points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about development of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description to get a circumstance a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is now more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed which the businessman had Formerly been involved in local advocacy on setting up and environmental issues, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from very distinct Specialist backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have become synonymous With all the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-higher water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times and René Collier waded via waist-significant h2o through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the Bodily truth on the coastline as well as the symbolic character of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive tactic.
As the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom should figure out if the wall as developed complies with planning permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Distinctive Spot of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and arranging problems. Nonetheless the human component continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Dwell together with each other extensive after the legal prices are actually paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation lengthen further than that handle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles including environmental security and residence legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a spot of natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partly designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. Whether it will eventually eventually be altered, eliminated, or completed as prepared will count on the courtroom’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will most likely proceed to look in headlines, connected indelibly to The most intently viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.